Re: Paper on Privacy in Electronic Voting for the Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Wed Jun 16 2004 - 15:20:10 CDT

At 4:14 PM -0400 6/16/04, David Mertz wrote:
>On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:04 PM, David Jefferson wrote:
>>I enjoyed reading your privacy paper. But there is an element to
>>privacy/secrecy that you hardly touched, and I would very much
>>like to read a scholarly, historical discussion of it: the fact
>>that in most states vote privacy is MANDATORY in precinct
>>voting.
>
>I did touch briefly on the distinction between the right to
>*disclose* a vote, and the prohibition on being able to *prove* that
>same vote.
>
>While it would be interesting to write about this topic further, we
>are already over the length we should be (or that Arthur can
>actually READ during his alloted presentation, assuming it's
>accepted). So I think that historical discussion is for a different
>paper.

Davids,

I'd be happy to add the appropriate end note if you write it and tell
me where to put it. Thanks!

Best regards.
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Jun 30 23:17:17 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 23:17:30 CDT