Re: OVC on HR 811

From: charlie strauss <cems_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 - 11:46:15 CDT

great term. I hope this infects the voting community's vocabulary.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Dechert <dechert@gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 19, 2007 10:34 AM
>To: Open Voting Consortium discussion list <ovc-discuss@listman.sonic.net>
>Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] OVC on HR 811
>
>
>I have described the type of "disclosure" described in HR 811 as "reviewer
>sequestration."
>
>I haven't received a lot of pats on the back publicly from Rebecca Mercuri,
>but I got one for this yesterday. From another list, Rebecca wrote:
>
>> Alan Dechert said:
>> > I consider it "reviewer sequestration" -- not disclosure.
>>
>> Right, great term, that. Because Holt makes sure that only CERTAIN
>> things can be "disclosed" and those, perhaps, only under the terms of
>> the NDA (which might be under cloak of the court, for example).
>>
>> Ridiculous.
>>
>> Rebecca Mercuri.
>>
>Rebecca also said she thinks our revelations about Microsoft influence may
>be causing Holt some grief. Kim Zetter now reporting that the bill seems to
>have stalled.
>
>http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/07/holt-paper-trai.html
>
>Alan D.
>
>_______________________________________________
>OVC-discuss mailing list
>OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Jul 31 23:17:05 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 31 2007 - 23:17:08 CDT