Re: Question re US EAC Technical Decision-Makers

From: Lillie Coney <coney_at_epic_dot_org>
Date: Wed Jul 12 2006 - 17:28:21 CDT

Doug this is absolutely not the case. The TGDC repeatedly ignored
advice given by NIST regarding such basic security threats at the
IR ports on voting machines. Really see the advice given by NIST
to the TGDC you should look at the document prepared by NIST
and edited by the TGDC. It is the best source on the recommendations
on voting systems made by the agency to the EAC.

The following is the link to the transcript for the last TGDC meeting
to draft their voting standards document for submission to the
EAC.

http://www.epic.org/privacy/voting/foia/tgdc042005.rtf

Thanks
Lillie

>On Jul 12, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
>
>> I'm at NASS and have been told that the EAC lets NIST make their
>> technical decisions on voting system requirements. Is that true?
>> I've rather heard that people without computer engineering or science
>> degrees make the decisions for the US EAC.
>
>The TGDC has overruled or ignored some NIST recommendations. I suspect
>that it's accurate to say that the EAC lets the TGDC make technical
>decisions. The TGDC works with NIST, but NIST folks have limited
>election expertise (they are learning fast, though), while TGDC is
>dominated by elections insiders (with only a few members who know
>much about computers).
>
> Doug Jones
> jones@cs.uiowa.edu
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OVC-discuss mailing list
>OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

-- 
Lillie Coney
Associate Director
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
Coordinator, National Committee for Voting Integrity (NCVI)
1718 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20009
(p) 202-483-1140 x 111
(f) 202-483-1248
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Mon Jul 31 23:17:04 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 31 2006 - 23:17:09 CDT