Re: Re: Small Linux platforms-bidding on real RFPs

From: David Webber \(XML\) <"David>
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 20:20:10 CDT


If everything connects thru bindings and neutral
APIs it allows implementers to integrate into their
own environment.

I believe while you want a reference implementation
that is non-proprietary - you cannot exclude people
integrating your components into their solution -
especially if you offer an OSI license.

In fact you postively *want* to encourage as broad
an adoption as possible.

That's the basis I see - that you have a core foundation,
but that is non-exclusive.

Otherwise there is an issue - the OVC can potentially
fall foul of exactly the same pitfall that vendors are -
where they want to own the solution space to the
exclusion of everyone else.

Therefore to avoid this - you want to encourage people
to adopt as much from the OVC approach as practical
but stopping short of mandating OVC to the exclusion
of everything else.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan L. Adams" <>
To: "David Webber (XML)" <>; "Open Voting Consortium
discussion list" <>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] Re: Small Linux platforms-bidding on real RFPs

> Hash: SHA1
> David Webber (XML) wrote:
> > It simply does not make sense to have to
> > write everything from scratch.
> Strawman. I never suggested we had to write everything (or anything for
> that matter) from scratch; I just said it couldn't be proprietary.
> Nathan
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
> s4lRhyaQMTMYVkuNyYY76aY=
> =DouR

OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Jul 31 23:17:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:43:09 CDT