Re: Understanding difference between TLV, EML, VVPB and what the vendors want to flog as VVPAT

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Sun Jul 03 2005 - 20:59:57 CDT

>From § 301(a)(5) of HAVA:

ERROR RATES.—The error rate of the voting system in counting ballots
(determined by taking into account only those errors which are
attributable to the voting system and not attributable to an act of
the voter) shall comply with the error rate standards established
under section 3.2.1 of the voting systems standards issued by the
Federal Election Commission which are in effect on the date of the
enactment of this Act.

(the [2002 FEC standards] are the relevant ones...)

[2002 FEC standards]: http://josephhall.org/fec_vss_2002_pdf/

On 7/3/05, Ed Kennedy <ekennedyx@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello Joseph:
>
> Thanks for your reading and interpretation of HAVA. This was as I
> suspected. As you may have noticed, I'm always trying to nail down certain
> elusive terms and one of my leading muddy terms showed up in your email,
> "Error Rates." What does HAVA say about error rates?
> --
>
> Thanks, Edmund R. Kennedy
>
> Always work for the common good.
>
> 10777 Bendigo Cove
> San Diego, CA 92126-2510
> USA
>
> I blog now and then at: <http://ekennedyx.blogspot.com/>
> Also, I've got a web site at <http://geocities.com/ekennedyx/>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <joehall@gmail.com>
> To: "Open Voting Consortium discussion list" <ovc-discuss@listman.sonic.net>
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] Understanding difference between TLV, EML,VVPB
> and what the vendors want to flog as VVPAT
>
>
> > On 7/2/05, Charlie Strauss <cems@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> First, a state needs to be HAVA-compliant -=in order to get the
> >> >>> HAVA money=-. If they turn down the Federal money, they can do
> >> >>> any damn thing they want. HAVA has no hard requirements, only
> >> >>> cash incentives.
> >> >>
> >> >> The common understanding is that this statement is completely
> >> >> false. Can you support it? I'd really like it to be true so I'd
> >> >> like a reference. Every person I've talked to including the head
> >> >> of NASED has implied that the federal law specifies ADA
> >> >> requirments regardless of whether you take the cash.
> >
> >
> > (This is in no way legal advice. Please consult your attorney if you
> > make decisions based on the following remarks.)
> >
> > Title III of HAVA (Sec. 301 et seq.) is not optional, no matter what
> > money a state accepts under Title I or II.
> >
> > (As a reminder, Sec. 301 defines the minimum requirements for voting
> > systems used in elections for federal office (pre-casting vote
> > verification and opportunity to change vote, manual audit capacity,
> > disabled and alternative language accessibility, error rates, uniform
> > vote definition and the effective date to meet these requirements (1
> > Jan 2006)).)
> >
> > --
> > Joseph Lorenzo Hall
> > UC Berkeley, SIMS PhD Student
> > <http://josephhall.org/>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OVC discuss mailing lists
> > Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to
> > arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OVC discuss mailing lists
> Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
>

-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
UC Berkeley, SIMS PhD Student
<http://josephhall.org/>
blog: <http://josephhall.org/nqb2/>
This email is written in [markdown] - an easily-readable and parseable
text format.
[markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Sun Jul 31 23:17:13 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:43:09 CDT