Re: Understanding difference between TLV, EML, VVPB and what the vendors want to flog as VVPAT

From: Charlie Strauss <cems_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Sat Jul 02 2005 - 19:19:47 CDT

On Jul 1, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Jim March wrote:

> David Webber (XML) wrote:
>> Just for Bev Harris and her staffs FYI - paper only is a dog
>> that will not hunt - simply because HAVA mandates (its the
>> law) that you provide computer assisted voting - and so
>> manual-only systems technically *must* be replaced.
> First, a state needs to be HAVA-compliant -=in order to get the
> HAVA money=-. If they turn down the Federal money, they can do any
> damn thing they want. HAVA has no hard requirements, only cash
> incentives.

The common understanding is that this statement is completely false.
Can you support it? I'd really like it to be true so I'd like a
reference. Every person I've talked to including the head of NASED
has implied that the federal law specifies ADA requirments regardless
of whether you take the cash.

OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Jul 31 23:17:12 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:43:09 CDT