Re: SB 1438 DRE definition amended...

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Fri Jul 02 2004 - 11:37:57 CDT

Charlie,

> Third, I think its a bad idea to hope for a law which does not cover
> the OVC case. You WANT the law to talk about the OVC case.
>
The main thing: we did not want legislation that someone could use to say
the OVC system is a DRE, and therefore, would need to comply with some other
regulations about DREs (e.g., Shelley's DRE standards).

Sure we want legal code that covers OVC. We're just starting to think about
that. ACR 242 is a nice start--introducting our ideas to the state
legislature.

Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sat Jul 31 23:17:13 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 31 2004 - 23:17:15 CDT