I sort of assumed everyone has seen this, but found out that some people here haven't heard, and I could not find it posted to our list (maybe someone already did and I missed it?)
Anyway, I think this is a strong indication that open source voting has a high likelihood of success in the United States. Obama likes the idea.
Of course, there's always google, but here are few articles and links about this ...
Calls for open source government
By Maggie Shiels
Technology reporter, BBC News, Silicon Valley
Open source software means the source code is available under license
The secret to a more secure and cost effective government is through open source technologies and products.
The claim comes from one of Silicon Valley's most respected business leaders Scott McNealy, a co-founder of Sun Microsystems.
He revealed he has been asked to prepare a paper on the subject for the new administration.
"It's intuitively obvious open source is more cost effective and productive than proprietary software," he said.
"Open source does not require you to pay a penny to Microsoft or IBM or Oracle or any proprietary vendor any money."
Mr McNealy told the BBC he wants to ensure the government does not get "locked in" to one specific vendor or company.
"The government ought to mandate open source products based on open source reference implementations to improve security, get higher quality software, lower costs, higher reliability - all the benefits that come with open software.
Sun Microsystems' Java programming language is an open source product used in billions of devices such as mobile phones and computers. Instead of charging for a copyrighted program, by and large any open source product is publicly available, is licensed under royalty free terms for unrestricted use and has an open code for all to see, copy and adapt for free.
The idea behind this is that the thinking of many will improve a product by leaps and bounds and keep it relevant.
A report by global technology research house XMG said companies "were exploring the advantages of open source software" due to the "prohibitive" cost of proprietary products.
President Obama has said he is prepared to go through the budget "line by line" to cut wasteful spending, but has so far failed to give any specifics of how that would be done.
The Open Source Initiative, or OSI, is fully supportive of Mr McNealy's efforts which both believe is one of the main solutions the new President cannot afford to ignore.
Mr McNealy says the benefits of open source products can't be ignored
"Scott is absolutely correct about the benefits which have been demonstrated time and again," said OSI president Michael Tiemann.
"It's an accident of history that proprietary standards became so entrenched so early and it's been a colossal expense for government."
Mr Tiemann said while some departments already use open source technologies, overall it has been estimated that the global loss due to proprietary software is "in excess of $1 trillion a year."
He claimed that the conservative cost for the US is from " $400bn (£290bn) and upwards."
"A move to open source will lower costs and increase capability," said Mr Tiemann who is also the vice-president of Red Hat, the world's leading open source technology solutions provider.
"This is the kind of change we need if we are ever going to see the government reform its operational capabilities and cost basis. If they fail to do this, it's one more stick in the mud. The capital markets are telling us today we can no longer afford much more status quo," he stated.
The Open Solutions Alliance has said the present economic downturn "will lead to an increase in adoption of open solutions due to their flexibility, scalability and value."
Meanwhile research firm Gartner has warned that the benefits of open source might not deliver unless properly managed.
"Do not expect to automatically save money with open source software, or OSS, or any technology without effective financial management," said analyst Mark Driver.
Microsoft and Oracle have opened up some of their software and protocols to developers.
"Open source President"
So just how receptive will the 44th President will be to the idea of a implementing the workings of a new government around open standards?
Mr Obama has promised an open and transparent government
"The concept of open source is going to become an undercurrent to almost everything this administration does," declared the OSI's Michael Tiemann.
"The American concept of democracy is not just of the people and by the people but with the people."
He said we have already seen a commitment to this open philosophy throughout President Obama's election campaign.
"I think what we will see now is a maturation in America and around the world of an understanding of the open source model."
Errol Louis of the New York Daily News seemed to agree.
He described Mr Obama as "our first open source President, a leader willing to let anybody and everybody figure out how, when and where they want to get involved."
He noted that the strategy popularised by computer software companies in giving away software to get others to improve on it has now been applied to politics.
Indeed the new Change.gov website is said to be a portal for "interactive government" and "open source democracy."
Mr McNealy said a new cabinet post of chief information officer (CIO) was necessary to drive this fundamental root and branch change.
Java, which went open source in 2006, is on 6 billion devices
He added that the CIO should "have veto power, the right to eliminate any hardware, software or networking product that touches the federal network.
"He or she would have real power, real oversight and employ real consequences for folk that don't realign with the architecture. It's what every business does that the government doesn't," he concluded.
The OSI's Mr Tiemann disagreed and said that a CIO post "would be a waste of an executive slot."
"Knowing what I know about the structure and nature of the federal government, I can't believe there is much value to having a CIO who would have to implement across the departments who find it hard to co-operate regardless of the technical hurdles.
" A CIO would just not be a productive post over the next four years," stated Mr Tiemann.
Sun's McNealy Advises Obama Administration on Open Source
Jan 23, 2009
Sun cofounder Scott NcNealy has submitted a paper to the new U.S. administration about the cost savings and security benefits of Open Source software.
According to BBC News, the Obama administration has asked Sun chairman McNealy for a position statement justifying the administration's use of open source software. The BBC wasn't clear on who specifically asked him, but McNealy's spokesperson, on a query by the Linux community, acknowledged that McNealy had been meeting over the last year with members of the administration's new technology initiative, which apparently led to this request.
The former head of Sun advised the administration not to get "locked in" to a specific software vendor or company. He suggested that "the government ought to mandate open source products based on open source reference implementations to improve security, get higher quality software, lower costs, higher reliability."
Part of the reason for the government's request for proposal could be Obama's urgency to go "line by line" through the budget to cut unnecessary spending. And Obama had already promised during his campaign that he will insist on an open and transparent government. The administration's Technology Agenda says that it intends to "open up government to its citizens," and that with cutting-edge technologies.
McNealy's statements have clear support from the Open Source Initiative (OSI). According to OSI president (and Red Hat VP) Michael Tiemann, "It's an accident of history that proprietary standards became so entrenched so early and it's been a colossal expense for government." He estimates that the global loss due to proprietary software is "in excess of $1 trillion a year." Research firm Gartner Group tempers this slightly with analyst Mark Driver's assessment, "Do not expect to automatically save money with open source software, or OSS, or any technology without effective financial management."
Whether McNealy's appeal will have an immediate effect on the administration's technology decisions is yet to be seen. In any case, the White House Briefing Room has shown its best intentions by instituting a citizen blog with a mission: Communication, Transparency, Participation.
Obama taps Sun's McNealy for open source advice
by Jacqueline Emigh
January 23, 2009, 5:05 PM
Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystems' co-founder and chairman, says that President Barack Obama has asked him to write a white paper on the benefits of open source technology.
In an interview with the BBC, McNealy contended that government should mandate the use of open source products to "improve security, get higher quality software, lower costs, [and obtain] higher reliability -- all the benefits that come with open software."
McNealy ought to know, because his company is experienced on both sides. Over the years, Sun has produced the open source Java platform, along with the traditionally proprietary Solaris operating system.
Obama first got dubbed the "Open Source President" less than a week after the election, but for different reasons.
In a CNN broadcast on November 10, Republican pundit Alex Castallanos applied the "Bazaar vs. Cathedral" metaphor -- adopted from a 1997 essay by Eric S. Raymond, and still used today in software engineering -- to predicting how the Obama administration will operate. Obama will follow a Bazaar-style, bottoms-up, grassroots and "open source" approach, as opposed to a "proprietary," tops-down Cathedral model, according to the pundit.
Considering Open Source in Government, McNealy SaysPosted by Lora Bentley Jan 21, 2009 1:00:33 PM
Open source technology makes a more secure government, says Scott McNealy. According to BBC News, the Sun Microsystems co-founder is preparing a paper on the subject at the request of the Obama administration.
"It's intuitively obvious open source is more cost effective and productive than proprietary software," he told the BBC. In fact, he's even suggesting that the U.S. go so far as to follow Vietnam's lead and mandate open source. "The government ought to mandate open source products based on open source reference implementations to improve security, get higher quality software, lower costs, higher reliability," he said.
President Obama has promised an open and transparent government, so it makes sense that open source technology could be a part of his strategy -- especially given that several different agencies already use open source to some extent. And open source could also save the government a lot of money, which is something else Obama has promised -- to go through the budget line by line.
Other open source leaders agree with McNealy. Open Source Initiative president Michael Tiemann told the BBC, "It's an accident of history that proprietary standards became so entrenched so early and it's been a colossal expense for government." He estimates technology costs to the U.S. at "$400 billion and upwards."
Just as in so many other areas, though, we'll have to wait and see just how the new administration will carry out its promises.
OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 07 2010 - 00:09:57 CST