Re: [OVC-discuss] draft of text for new OVC-sponsored bill

From: Alan Dechert <dechert_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 14:35:45 CST

From: "Ronald Crane" <voting@lastland.net>
> Alan Dechert wrote:
>> From: Ronald Crane
>>
>>> OVC's focus on ballot printers for all voters oversells their
>>> benefits and understates their security risks, especially
>>> versus hand-filled, machine-tabulated paper ballot systems.
>>>
>> This is pure opinion. You have absolutely no data with which to back
>> this up.
> I have identified a variety of attack forms (presentation, selection, DoS,
> etc.) and vectors (e.g., attack the voting application
> website/CDs/hashes/trust tree, instrument various kinds of firmware, use
> network vulnerabilities) in this and other recent threads on this list.
Nothing whatsoever specific to the OVC system and procedures. I don't think
you even bothered to come to the LinuxWorld demo. Maybe you could have
demonstrated your hacks there. I don't think you would have been
successful.

AD

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Jan 7 00:09:55 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 07 2010 - 00:09:57 CST