Re: [OVC-discuss] write-ins by anarchists

From: David Mertz <mertz@gnosis.cx>
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 12:49:09 CST

I think there is a mixed story here on write-ins.

I would personally prefer that election laws/regulations allowed
counting every write-in vote, without restriction to "registered"
candidates. That's my own political opinion though, jurisdictions
need to make this decision, not me. Certainly, however, it should not
be a restriction of OVC systems to disallow this at a technical level.

However, in jurisdictions where only pre-determined candidates are
even counted as write-ins, there's really no "anarchist" purpose
served by enabling voters to cast uncounted votes. As someone else
commented, a "protest" vote stuck on a local bulletin board means more
than an unrecorded write-in. For those cases, voters should best be
shown a list of candidates whose vote will at least be counted.

There's no reason this difference need be "deep" though. Software
could easily have a binary switch for "allow free-form write-ins".
For jurisdictions that at least count that, enable the switch;
otherwise, show voters what votes might actually count.
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Jan 7 00:09:53 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 07 2010 - 00:09:57 CST