Re: A 3-Step Audit Protocol w/ 99%confidence

From: Kathy Dopp <kathy_dot_dopp_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Fri Jan 26 2007 - 18:40:41 CST

On 1/26/07, Kathy Dopp <kathy.dopp@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> 2. The assumption is merely for the amount of vote shift that is
> considered to be "NOT IMMEDIATELY NOTICEABLY SUSPICIOUS" (read all our
> literature - beginning with Roy Saltman), so that any amount that was
> shifted over that amount is immediately noticeable and suspicious. So
> any vote count that has over the amount of 2 times the margin shift
> from either:
>

Oops. I meant of course "any vote count with over 2 * the vote shift
max" or any vote count with over the assumed unsuspicious amount of
margin shift from the polls, the voter registration, or prior
elections should automatically be slapped into the audit sample. This
is a logical extension of the definition of assumed maximum vote shift
per vote count as being the maximum amount that is considered not to
be suspicious.
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Jan 1 14:12:49 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 14:12:51 CST