Re: "California Monitoring Program Reports Votes Cast on Electronic Machines Were Accurately Recorded"

From: David Jefferson <d_jefferson_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Tue Jan 16 2007 - 09:55:23 CST

I did not have anything to do with parallel testing in CA this year,
but I have in the past. On the previous occasions the testing was
done very carefully and professionally, and only one serious anomaly
was ever found (a probable calibration problem on an ES&S DRE). I am
not vouching for the information in this article since I was not
there, but I don't think it is "the usual disinformation". It can
probably be taken at face value.

David

On Jan 16, 2007, at 7:39 AM, Edmund R. Kennedy wrote:

> Hello:
>
> Does anybody know anything about the story below? Seems like
> the usual disinformation, but if anyone has participated, I'd be
> interested in hearing about the methodology.
>
> <http://www.govtech.net/news/news.php?
> id=103256&utm_source=gten_070112&utm_medium=enews&utm_content=story>
>
> --
> 10777 Bendigo Cove
> San Diego, CA 92126-2510
>
> 858-578-8842
>
> Work for the common good.
> My profile:
> I blog now and then at:
>
> _______________________________________________
> OVC-discuss mailing list
> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Jan 1 14:12:45 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 14:12:51 CST