Re: Proposed independent Audit Legislation

From: Richard C. Johnson <dick_at_iwwco_dot_com>
Date: Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:04:06 CST

  Hi!
   
  I attach an edited version. Picky mostly, focused on defining terms as used. The audit legislation seems to me a good thing and a basic no-brainer.
   
  Best wishes for the legislative process!
   
  -- Dick
   
    Richard C. Johnson, Ph.D.
CEO
Open Voting Solutions, Inc.
  dick@openvotingsolutions.com
  www.openvotingsolutions.com
631-689-3736 office
631-689-3774 fax
631-827-6899 cell

  

Kathy Dopp <kathy@uscountvotes.org> wrote:

  Kathy Dopp wrote:
> I need help today (Sunday) if possible to review this 4 page proposed audit
> legislation that we're proposing here in Utah.

Attached is a MS word version w/ track changes turned on - so please
suggest modifications by just making them in this doc, and an rtf
version for those who don't use MS word.

Thanks. Any input you can give today would be appreciated.

Kathy
http://electionarchive.org
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
  

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================

Received on Mon Jan 8 20:24:36 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 08 2007 - 20:24:39 CST