Re: Very drafty FAQ

From: <Adechert_at_aol_dot_com>
Date: Fri Jan 09 2004 - 11:44:38 CST

I'll have more to say about this soon. I'm still bogged down with a lot of
other things to do.

Karl, in numero uno, you have openvoting.com. Should be openvoting.org or
openvotingconsortium.org Actually, I want to shut down openvoting.com.

I like the general approach you are taking here. You document shows a lot of
thought and effort. We may want a site map or table of contents.

My last name ends with "ert" not "art."

Maybe for Terminology you could have a few terms defined there with a link to
a more complete glossary.

As David Jefferson and others have pointed out, we need a section devoted to
how OVC stands in comparison to other voting systems, voting modernization
projects/proposals, and voting equipment vendors.

http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/December.2003/0332.html

More later.

Thanks again for your work on the FAQ, Karl! You too, Laird. And thanks
also to other contributors like Rick et al. We have a long way to go with this
but we have a start.

Alan D.

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon Jan 10 00:48:09 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 10 2005 - 00:48:14 CST