Paperless voting Re: OVC-discuss Digest, Vol 28, Issue 25

From: John Burik <John_at_caseohio_dot_org>
Date: Wed Feb 14 2007 - 14:33:40 CST

While Holt II permits voting with paper ballots counted either via optical
scan or by hand, its minimum standards permits DREs with verifiable paper
trails of which at best only 10% will be counted in an audit. Its Sec. 327
permits reliance on machine counts in the presence of clear and convincing
evidence the paper records have been compromised.

I do not support AS WRITTEN.

John, CASE

On 2/14/07 3:00 PM, "ovc-discuss-request@listman.sonic.net"
<ovc-discuss-request@listman.sonic.net> wrote:
 
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Fw: Ban paperless voting (Edmund R. Kennedy)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:44:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Edmund R. Kennedy" <ekennedyx@yahoo.com>
> Subject: [OVC-discuss] Fw: Ban paperless voting
> To: Open Voting Consortium discussion list
> <ovc-discuss@listman.sonic.net>
> Message-ID: <955326.77361.qm@web81911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> FYI
>Dear MoveOn member,
> Too many voters are still stuck with paperless electronic voting
> machines?machines
> that are vulnerable to tampering and malfunction.

[snip]

-- 
John Burik MEd, PCC
<jburik@fuse.net>
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:16 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 23:17:27 CST