Re: confused about COTS vs open hardware

From: Brian Behlendorf <brian_at_behlendorf_dot_com>
Date: Sat Feb 10 2007 - 15:05:26 CST

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Alan Dechert wrote:
>> But back to the topic at hand - as another huge OSS advocate, I also feel
>> that focusing first on OSS for the voting application itself (inclusive of
>> all business logic related to voting) and leaving OSS for the operating
>> system and firmware later is our best bet. ....
>>
> Interesting to hear that from you, Brian. It seems like the operating
> system would be relatively easy to move to OSS. Firmware maybe not so easy,
> but doable over time.

Seems like it, wouldn't it? Just saying, don't let it be a roadblock.
Transparency in the voting software is the most important thing. If a
vendor does that but still wants to run on unmodified
commercial-off-the-shelf Windows, it's clearly inferior but should still
qualify at some level.

         Brian

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:14 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 23:17:27 CST