Re: HR 811 text?

From: Barbara Simons <simons_at_acm_dot_org>
Date: Tue Feb 06 2007 - 19:21:56 CST

Holt also requires that the paper be of archival quality. That
eliminates thermal printers.
Regards,
Barbara

On Feb 6, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Alan Dechert wrote:

> By what date?  And where's the money to do that?
>
>  
> A DRE with the paper tape sealed under glass has fundamental
> differences compared to an electronic ballot printer. 
>
>  
> We want electronic ballot printers (as opposed to DREs) but any
> proposal about how to get there needs to make sense.
>
>  
> Alan D.
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: Jim March
>>
>> To: Open Voting Consortium discussion list
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:40 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [OVC-discuss] HR 811 text?
>>
>>
>> Wellll...one bit of good news is that by banning sequencial storage
>> of votes, it automatically ditches the "toilet paper roll" concept...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OVC-discuss mailing list
>> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
>> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> OVC-discuss mailing list
> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
  

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:07 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 23:17:27 CST