Help with EML like "properties" for adoption.

From: David RR Webber \(XML\) <"David>
Date: Sat Feb 03 2007 - 14:37:29 CST
Just saw your note :
> Perhaps we could describe in our resolution the standard -- including some
> of its properties (e.g., XML-based, compatible licensing, etc.) -- we want
> to adopt.
> If so, can we get help with a list of those properties?
> Alan D.
I believe we can distill this list easily - and then of course any standards matching those criteria would be preferred.
The EML white paper that just was published - certainly lots of bullet points in there that are candidate items - i can work with John Borras (TC Chair) and Joe Hall (TC member) on getting that set together during the coming week - and then we'll send something over for OVC consideration.
Thanks, DW

"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)

OVC-discuss mailing list

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:06 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 23:17:27 CST