Re: Should OVC adopt the OASIS EML standard?

From: Alan Dechert <dechert_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Sat Feb 03 2007 - 13:36:38 CST

> At 11:45 AM -0800 2/2/07, Alan Dechert wrote:
>>Yes, I know. I'm wondering if we can, perhaps, adopt a somewhat general
>>resolution in favor of EML rather than endorsing a specific version.
>
> That's different than endorsing OASIS EML. I would have no problems
> with endorsing data interoperability standards in general, be they
> the P1622 effort or the OASIS EML effort. But I wouldn't endorse a
> particular variant without a comparison study and a review of the
> implications of that choice.
>
Perhaps we could describe in our resolution the standard -- including some
of its properties (e.g., XML-based, compatible licensing, etc.) -- we want
to adopt.

If so, can we get help with a list of those properties?

Alan D.

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:06 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 28 2007 - 23:17:27 CST