Re: our bill from leg counsel

From: Ron Crane <voting_at_lastland_dot_net>
Date: Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:15:30 CST

Alan Dechert wrote:
> Here it is. I only have the pdf.
>
> It will be introduced as-is. We'll amend it in committee. So, let's
> start on it.... maybe take a paragraph or two at a time.
>
> Also, we need a one-page fact sheet saying what we're trying to do --
> to send out to potential co-authors.
Except for the "urgency statute" provision (s.3), this bill is almost
identical to the one you posted here on 1/25. I have the same comments
about it as about that one. Attached is a much tighter bill. It
clarifies what needs to be disclosed when, requires the disclosure of
appropriate documentation, fixes the "voting system-specific" issue, and
describes what happens when a vendor wants to modify an existing system.
My bill does not attempt to handle some critical issues, like formal
public review, election-day citizen verification of the software being
used, Nevada Gaming Control Board-style inspections, and parallel
testing. Do we want to try to address these issues now?

-R

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================

Received on Tue Feb 28 23:17:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:17:08 CST