Re: open-audit elections

From: Charlie Strauss <cems_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Wed Dec 13 2006 - 00:51:25 CST

On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Ben Adida wrote:

>
> Ronald,
>
> I fully agree with your goal, but you're mistaken regarding what
> open-audit techniques achieve.

Ben You need to nail down what the heck you are talking about. All
our e-mails are tail chasing, long philosophy courses with no
objective entity to discuss.

Are you talking about VoteHERE, Triple ballot? Something Else.
What's the implementation and chain of custody?

PLease give a worked example.

>
> Cryptography is specifically the science of *not* delegating power or
> trust to anyone.

This is meaningless without an example.

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Dec 31 23:17:12 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 31 2006 - 23:17:16 CST