Re: latent fingerprints

From: Jerry Lobdill <lobdillj_at_charter_dot_net>
Date: Fri Dec 08 2006 - 10:31:21 CST

I'm not confusing anything. The assertion was made that the
fingerprints on a ballot could be detected somehow when the scanned
image is viewed. I want to know how that would be done.

At 09:33 AM 12/8/2006, you wrote:

>From: "Edmund R. Kennedy" <ekennedyx@yahoo.com>
>
>
>Hello:
>
> I'm not sure but I believe you are confusing latent
> fingerprints with 'invisible' fingerprints. Latent prints are
> effectively invisible unless some sort of dye particles are added
> that stick to the residual finger oils and so forth to make them visible.
>
>--
>10777 Bendigo Cove
>San Diego, CA 92126-2510
>858-578-8842
>

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Dec 31 23:17:09 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 31 2006 - 23:17:16 CST