Re: "dumb scanners"

From: Arthur Keller <voting_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri Dec 08 2006 - 02:06:49 CST

At 11:52 AM -0800 12/7/06, Ronald Crane wrote:
>But there needs to be only one "dumb scanner" (under officials' control) to
>avoid invading privacy by scanning voters' fingerprints, ballot serial
>numbers, etc. The "dumb scanner" can mis-scan in the same way as existing
>all-in-one scanners, so we still need sampling hand audits. I'm not sure that
>this approach solves much, but at least it appears to preserve privacy.

Any system, including hand-counted paper ballots in precincts,
requires sampling hand audits.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Sun Dec 31 23:17:09 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 31 2006 - 23:17:16 CST