Re: Re: The 11 days of Florida

From: Edmund R. Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Wed Dec 01 2004 - 21:22:08 CST

Your rough results seem to me be the equal of a smoke
alarm going off. It says there could be something
going on and folks should check further.

Thanks, Ed Kennedy
--- ovc-discuss-bounces@listman.sonic.net
<kathy@directell.com> wrote:
>
> Keith Copenhagen said:
> >
> >
> > Florida's election supervisors, impressed by the
success of early
> > voting, proposed dramatic reforms Tuesday that
would eliminate Election
> > Day, replace it with an 11-day election season
and do away with
> > precincts.
> >
>
> >
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/state/10308159.htm?1c
> >
>
> Interesing Keith,
>
> FYI, A few of USCountVotes statisticians (off list
but cc'ing me) have
> been discussing the Miami Herald "recount" of 3
opscan FL counties and
> have noted several things:
>
> 1. The Miami Herald did not report the method they
used to recount the
> ballots (did they only examine over-voted ballots by
hand & use machines
> to recount the rest or count them all by hand?)
>
> 2. The Miami Herald did not report which of the
precincts they recounted
> of the 60% precincts in Suwanee County, and that
there isn't a set of
> precincts in Suwanee whose votes add up to that
reported by the Miami
> Herald as the official vote total in Suwanee. It
would be easy to slant
> the count by selecting the wrong precincts, so the
Suwanee county recount
> is meaningless.
>
> 3. The Miami Herald chose op-scan counties to
recount that would not
> likely (according to what some of these
statisticians thought) yield big
> errors. (I myself would have selected Dixie county
and a couple of others
> instead of any of the 3 the Miami Herald selected.)
>
> 4. The Miami Herald reported that the results of
its recount did not
> indicate that the election results would be
overturned, yet mathematical
> extrapolation of the % change in votes that Kerry
picked up in those 2
> counties times the total number of votes cast for
president in FL "Would
> have changed the results of the FL election". Of
course anyone realizes
> that this gross calculation is not accurate or
meaningful because you
> can't extrapolate like that.
>
> Another member of our group noted that the reported
recount of New
> Hampshire by the Boston newspaper also claimed that
the NH recount didn't
> show anything significant but failed to report any
actual numbers at all
> that would allow one to judge that analyses.
>
> The full mathematical study at the precinct level,
as soon as
> USCountVotes.org can get the systems in place to
obtain all the election
> results and recount data and normalize it into a
database, will be very
> interesting indeed.
>
> The newspapers' recount reports are more
enlightening for what they're
> "not" reporting. It will take a project like
http://USCountVotes.org to
> truly shed light on this election.
>
> I wonder how the early voting will affect the
accuracy of future FL
> elections?
>
> --
> Kathy Dopp
> US Count Votes
> http://USCountVotes.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OVC discuss mailing lists
> Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to
arthur@openvotingconsortium.org

=====

-- 
10777 Bendigo Cove
San Diego, CA 92126-2510
"We must all cultivate our gardens."  Candide-Voltaire
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Dec 31 23:17:01 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 31 2004 - 23:17:22 CST