Re: FAQ copyright? (I suggest Creative Commons' licenses)

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri Dec 26 2003 - 17:48:07 CST

At 3:26 PM -0800 12/26/03, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Douglas W. Jones wrote:
>
>> Say that Commercial Voting Company decides to reverse engineer our
>> product, out from under EVMPL...
>
>One possible way to reconcile the concept of open source/documentation (I
>won't get into the argument about whether one wants the copyleft aspect or
>now) is to have the OVC, now that it is a corporation, to create a trade
>or service mark that it will allow to be used only on those versions that
>meet the OVC's requirements.

Or the doc authors can formally assign the copyright to the OVC.

Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Dec 31 23:17:18 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2003 - 23:17:19 CST