Re: Critical analysis of VoteHere

From: Rick Gideon <rick_at_openvoting_dot_org>
Date: Sat Dec 13 2003 - 12:25:43 CST

Personally, that would be showing preference to VoteHere and is failing
the major topic at hand which is voter verifiable paper ballots. If they
want feedback on their products I'm sure they can ask for it themselves.

I'm unconvinced that VoteHere's technology is a viable replacement for
voting and should not even give VH the opportunity to say that OVC is
taking interest in their product. Which they will do.

Just my .02
rick

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, David Jefferson wrote:

> BTW, would anyone mind if I forwarded this thread of messages to
> VoteHere? I am sure they would like to hear how others react to
> their system, and they could benefit from your comments. If I
> don't hear any objection I will forward them on Monday, but I am
> happy not to do so if that is the protocol for this list or the
> preference of the writers.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Dec 31 23:17:09 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 31 2003 - 23:17:18 CST