Re: [OVC-discuss] Ranked Choice Math

From: Dylan Hirsch-Shell <dylanhs_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Fri Aug 08 2008 - 02:08:33 CDT

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Charlie Strauss <> wrote:

> Range voting is not practical (unless the range is zero to 4) on a
> system with 3 read heads. However, Range voting is a very intriguing
> method of voting worthy of more study. it might possibly be optimal
> by many criteria, but I wont' quite sign off on that till I (or
> someone else) looks at it's game theoretic strategies more
> carefully. It does appear that the "range" tend to collapse towards
> approval voting when one votes strategically rather than ranking ones
> "true" rating of the candidates.

Sorry for dredging up this ancient topic, but is this the study of the game
theoretic optimality of various voting systems you were hoping someone might

(Punchline: Range voting was the best (had lowest Bayesian regret, up to
statistically insignificant noise) with either honest voters, or with
strategic voters.)

Anyway, the folks at the Center for Range Voting (CRV;
also claim that range voting *can* be implemented on *all* current voting
machines without much pain:

Of course, having a voting machine like OVC's that could be relatively
easily tailored to range voting would be even better.

OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Sun Aug 31 23:17:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 23:17:18 CDT