Re: My comments for the cerification hearing on the 9th

From: David Jefferson <d_jefferson_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 03:24:06 CDT

Jim,

I don't expect to convince you with this message to tone down your
remarks, but maybe others can.

Irrespective of the merits of the points you raise in your testimony,
it is personally insulting to the SoS staff, clearly inflammatory,
and so generally over the top, that it will have no positive effect
at all. It will only anger the staff, and cause them to completely
discount anything you say.

And it will not only affect the reception of what you say. Anyone
else who has a similar message, even if more respectfully presented,
may nonetheless be discounted as well because they will be assumed to
be allied with you. An opinion is often received according to the
impression made by the most harsh and extreme advocates of that
position, and I think that is what will happen here. You thus
completely undercut your message when you make public remarks like
this, and you do nothing but harm to the causes you intend to serve.

Please give some thought to at least removing the personally
offensive material, and also toning down the other overheated rhetoric.

David

On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Jim March wrote:

> My comments for the California Secretary of State certification
> hearing 8/9/06 are attached, OR if the attachments don't come
> across it is in two parts and can be downloaded at:
>
> http://www.equalccw.com/sscomments12.pdf
>
> ...and an attachment to same at:
>
> http://www.equalccw.com/sscomments12a.pdf
>
> As my comments show, analysis of the disabled testers seems to show
> a bias for or against the Votepad based largely on whether or not
> they had tested some other electronic voting device. The vast
> majority had; apparantly the SecState's office has some sort of
> "pool of regulars" to draw from and when Votepad attempted to add
> "fresh blood" the SecState's office went semi-ballistic.
>
> The data on satisfaction patterns may indicate why. My initial
> comments (first link) will provide an intro to the data (second
> link), organized better than it is on the SecState's site.
>
> Jim March
> 916-370-0347
> jmarch@prodigy.net
> <sscomments12a.pdf>
> <sscomments12.pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> OVC-discuss mailing list
> OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

David Jefferson
d_jefferson@yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss

==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Aug 31 23:17:05 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 23:17:10 CDT