Re: Potent new evidence completing the Windows CEfraud picture

From: Douglas W. Jones <jones_at_cs_dot_uiowa_dot_edu>
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 09:28:28 CDT

On Aug 7, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Jim March wrote:

> First, I believe that stripping IE out of Win95 is a far less severe
> modification than creating a CE build.

True, except that Microsoft was adamantly saying, in Federal court, that
it was impossible. You can't have it both ways.

> Doug, somebody should have blown the whistle on this "certification"
> mess a very long time ago.

I haven't been exactly quiet. See, for example, my hastily prepared
testimony before the House science committee in the spring of 2001,
or my more carefully written materials presented to the FEC in late
2001 and 2002.

                Doug Jones
                jones@cs.uiowa.edu

_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Thu Aug 31 23:17:05 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 23:17:10 CDT