Question re. Op Scan error rates vs. Punch Card error rates

From: Kathy Dopp <kathy_at_uscountvotes_dot_org>
Date: Mon Aug 15 2005 - 22:34:19 CDT

Thank you very much to those who gave me the answers I needed re.
Diebold's redundancy.

I also need help with this:

Utah's Lt. Governor also claims that

"The average optical scan system error rate was 5.69%, far worse than
the average punchcard error rate of 3.83%"

Can anyone please help me rebut that?

THANK YOU!

It is difficult to keep up with all the stuff happening in Utah and try
to work to get the National Election Data Archive off the ground too. I
still have more to report from the NASED conference too when I get a chance.

FYI, I will post all the UT Lt. Governor's statements and my responses
at http://utahcountvotes.org/Response2Herbert.pdf by tomorrow some time.

Best Regards,

Kathy
http://utahcountvotes.org
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Aug 31 23:17:25 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:44:12 CDT