Re: Fw: re: Jim March, charges dropped

From: Jim March <jmarch_at_prodigy_dot_net>
Date: Wed Aug 03 2005 - 19:20:15 CDT

Arthur Keller wrote:

> At 12:43 PM -0700 8/3/05, Alan Dechert wrote:
>
>> Kathy,
>>
>>>
>>> While that's good for Jim, in a way, it is too bad for us, because
>>> it helpful to set legal precedance for giving the public the right
>>> to observe Diebold's central tabulators during tallying to ensure
>>> that it starts at zero, no one tampers, and all the cards are
>>> counted, etc. If they can continue to arrest anyone who does their
>>> patriotic duty to observe like Jim tried to do and then drop charges
>>> later, that is not good.
>>>
>> I agree. They were dumb enough to arrest him and lay on a phony
>> "felony" charge, but they were smart enough to give it up. They were
>> going to look very very bad arguing the case against Jim.
>>
>> Alan D.
>
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if Jim figures out a way to sue because of the
> inappropriate arrest.
>
> Best regards,
> Arthur

Neither would I :).

Jim

_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Aug 31 23:17:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:44:12 CDT