Re: Fw: re: Jim March, charges dropped

From: Arthur Keller <voting_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Wed Aug 03 2005 - 16:21:30 CDT

At 12:43 PM -0700 8/3/05, Alan Dechert wrote:
>Kathy,
>
>>
>>While that's good for Jim, in a way, it is too bad for us, because
>>it helpful to set legal precedance for giving the public the right
>>to observe Diebold's central tabulators during tallying to ensure
>>that it starts at zero, no one tampers, and all the cards are
>>counted, etc. If they can continue to arrest anyone who does their
>>patriotic duty to observe like Jim tried to do and then drop
>>charges later, that is not good.
>>
>I agree. They were dumb enough to arrest him and lay on a phony
>"felony" charge, but they were smart enough to give it up. They
>were going to look very very bad arguing the case against Jim.
>
>Alan D.

I wouldn't be surprised if Jim figures out a way to sue because of
the inappropriate arrest.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Wed Aug 31 23:17:24 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:44:12 CDT