Re: Fw: ACR 242

From: Alan Dechert <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
Date: Mon Aug 09 2004 - 16:46:21 CDT

David,

> It's probably worthwhile for Alan, Arthur and Doug (the actual
> officers) to state most similar opinions as their own. I don't know
> exactly what is required for a given stance to be an "official" OVC
> position... but probably more than just a board member agreeing with
> it. For 242, I think we don't need to push the issue of whether it is
> an official position.
>
Exactly. This issue came up the other day with Ed Kennedy. My response was
that the OVC is not quite fully functional in this regard. The bylaws call
for a number of committees that will determine a lot of these official
stances on issues. We're not quite there yet.

Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Aug 31 23:17:06 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 31 2004 - 23:17:22 CDT