Re: Fw: ACR 242

From: David Mertz <voting-project_at_gnosis_dot_cx>
Date: Mon Aug 09 2004 - 16:22:14 CDT

On Aug 9, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Douglas W. Jones wrote:
> And, is it a problem is OVC resources, are used for this purpose,
> and is the voting-project list an OVC resource.

Well... the list really is -not- an OVC resource. It isn't hosted by
OVC, and existed before OVC itself did.

But, FWIW, in posting my own letter and some fax numbers, I am not
writing as an OVC officer... if for no other reason than that I am NOT
an OVC officer. I just personally think supporting ACR 242 is a good

It's probably worthwhile for Alan, Arthur and Doug (the actual
officers) to state most similar opinions as their own. I don't know
exactly what is required for a given stance to be an "official" OVC
position... but probably more than just a board member agreeing with
it. For 242, I think we don't need to push the issue of whether it is
an official position.

Yours, David...
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
Received on Tue Aug 31 23:17:06 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 31 2004 - 23:17:22 CDT