Re: Proposed Electronic Ballot Image Format for

From: Alan Dechert <adechert_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Mon Aug 25 2003 - 09:43:05 CDT

In any case, we don't want to get into TTS for the demo, I think.

We can easily record voice prompts and candidate names.

Alan Dechert

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Shomphe" <mshomphe@comcast.net>
To: <voting-project@lists.sonic.net>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: [voting-project] Proposed Electronic Ballot Image Format for

> At 08:18 AM 8/25/2003 -0500, Douglas W. Jones wrote:
>
>
> These scanners should have display screens and
> >also text to speech capacity.
>
> TTS (text-to-speech) for names (e.g., saying a write-in-candidate) is
> appallingly poor. For example, there is no existing commercial
> off-the-shelf system that with recognize my name. In addition, if you
were
> to SPELL my last name, most COTS systems have language models attached to
> the grammars/reco engines that prevent my last name from being
> recognized. The search space for spelling is huge, so these open-domain
> recognizers typically restrict the search space by using the transitional
> probabilities of English.
>
> Basically, I would strongly advise against a TTS system. The reco
problems
> are HUGE!
>
> Matt
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Aug 31 23:17:16 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 23:17:18 CDT