Re: Re: Digest of QA/Developer Lead Discussion

From: Alan Dechert <adechert_at_earthlink_dot_net>
Date: Sat Aug 09 2003 - 20:28:38 CDT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Keller" <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
To: <voting-project@lists.sonic.net>
Cc: "voting project" <voting-project@lists.sonic.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Digest of QA/Developer Lead Discussion

> At 1:25 AM +0530 8/10/03, Anand Pillai wrote:
> > > 2) I would like to have the entire dialog copied to the list. We
want to
> >> see who is saying what, exactly. This takes no time at all -- just
cut
> >> and
> >> paste and send. No editing.
> >
> >I have reservations about this. People might talk about other things
> >than just the EVM project in chats. Copying and pasting would probably
> >disclose some information which the chat participants would not like
> >to divulge to a wider audience, elite they may be as the participants
> >in this esteemed list.
> >
> >I have no problems with creating a digest, and I am ready to spend
> >that time online. I can cite another four technical reasons at least why
> >the chat dilaog should not be copied. Here are some of these.
>
> A digest is fine. An edited summary is a good alternative. If no
> one wants to create that, then send out the unedited text. I'd
> rather read the digest or edited summary anyway.
>
I want the unedited text. If they don't want it published, that's okay. It
takes no more than 5 seconds to cut and paste the text and send. I want it.

Alan
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Aug 31 23:17:06 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 23:17:17 CDT