Re: Possible OVC "sub project"?

From: Arthur Keller <voting_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Thu Apr 28 2005 - 08:14:22 CDT

It's reasonable for there to be an OVC "seal of approval" or the
like. However, in the voting arena, the term certification has a
specific meaning relating to federal and state certification process.

When you say, we at SV OVC, it would be helpful to identify who all
you are and what you plan.

I am all for the process of volunteers creating software. We did
that with the demo, with limited success and a duration that took
twice as long as scheduled. If you can do better, more power to you.

Best regards,
Arthur

At 3:03 PM -0700 4/27/05, JamBoi wrote:
>A correction: of course we at OVC *can* set industry standards, create
>a certificate and the conformance test suite required for a
>manufacturer to get our certification! Its done every day in the
>software industry under the banner of "Open Standards".
>
>If OVC doesn't want to do this MOST IMPORTANT PIECE OF THE WHOLE
>PICTURE FOR OPEN E-VOTING then we at SV OVC will just add that to our
>to do list. But really I think that is a task that OVC could do much
>more effectively than the implementation projects that are being talked
>about right now. If the people on this list will work out the general
>concepts of the standard, we can easily translate them into engineerish
>and into the actual Open E-Voting Standards. No problem. We can then
>even turn it into an API, followed by a conformance test suite. There
>is no magic involved here. We at SV OVC have extensive experience in
>doing this type of work for the software industry.
>
>Now its true that this will not equal governmental certification. In
>fact it will be a much stricter standard. But if we do our job right
>then many governmental bodies and eventually hopefully even the federal
>government itself and other nations will adopt our standards.
>
>JamBoi
>
>> --- Arthur Keller <voting@kellers.org> wrote:
><snip>
>> > We are not in control of the certification process. While we can
>> > create our own acceptance and quality assurance tests, we cannot
>> > create the tests for certification. For better or worse, the
>> > Independent Testing Authorities and the individual states do
>> federal
>> > and state certification, respectively. There is cost involved in
>> > submission for certification.
>
>
>
>JamBoi
>
>"Live humbly, laugh often and love unconditionally" (anon)
>http://dailyJam.blogspot.com
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>OVC discuss mailing lists
>Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
_______________________________________________
OVC discuss mailing lists
Send requests to subscribe or unsubscribe to arthur@openvotingconsortium.org
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Sat Apr 30 23:17:18 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:17:22 CDT