Re: What is Data Model FOR?

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 11:32:27 CDT

At 12:21 PM +0000 4/30/04, dr-jekyll@att.net wrote:
>Hi Doug,
>
>> At each precinct, a precinct-level canvass is conducted, reporting:
>> a The number of ballots counted
>> b The number of votes for each candidate or position on an issue
>> c The number of undervotes for each race
>> d The number of overvotes for each race (always zero for DRE)
>> e The number of voters who signed in to vote at this precinct
>> f The number of provisional ballots distributed at this precinct
>
>The Data Model I proposed will support all of these, e's being
>manual process as you have already stated. In fact, the data item
>PROV_BALL_ID supports item f.
>
>In fact, the openness of our data layouts, be they either for
>download (SOS and counties put the lists of contests, candidates,
>ballot questions, etc for public, read-only access) or to support
>canvassing by having the polling stations report their results in a
>similar manner, would position us to become the source of a de facto
>standard for interchange of this information -- and rapid reporting
>of results, too.
>
>> Regarding Data Models, they are not just for relational databases.
>> Note that this is one of the most glaring failures of the Compuware
>> report for the State of Ohio. They set a criterion for the voting
>> system, that the data model of any database in the system be
>>clearly documented,
>> and then, on determining that the system used binary files with no
>> database management software, as such, they claimed that the criterion was
>> inapplicable.
>
>Sad.
>
>When I discussed this Data Model with some of the folks at NIST, one
>of them suggested that I submit it as an article to the ACM. She
>also suggested that I submit to OVC. Since submitting it, I've seen
>no reason to disbelieve in it. In my professional experience, the
>Data Models I've developed were proprietary property of the
>companies. What about my Data Model? Am I free to write about it
>or does my submitting to OVC make it proprietary property of OVC?
>
>Kurt

You are free to write about it elsewhere. As far as the OVC is
concerned, we treat it as public domain, but you can certainly write
it up and publish it where you see fit. However, until we've gotten
a chance to review the document and analyze and accept (or modify)
the data model, it should not be represented as the OVC's data model.
I'll be happy to do some of that analysis in a few weeks, but I'm not
ready to do that now.

Best regards,
Arthur

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:26 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT