RE: What is Data Model FOR?

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 14:36:33 CDT

It was baling wire and chewing gum for the demo, but we'll use a
better management and development process for the reference
implementation.

Best regards,
Arthur

At 2:18 PM -0500 4/29/04, Mark Winegar wrote:
>Ah, it is much easier with structured code. Hopefully, this project has
>strongproject management to enforce good modular design.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Arthur Keller [mailto:arthur@kellers.org]
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 11:46 AM
>To: voting-project@lists.sonic.net
>Cc: voting-project@lists.sonic.net
>Subject: RE: [voting-project] What is Data Model FOR?
>
>
>Our demo includes a Ballot Reconciliation Procedure demo (although it
>was not always shown). However, for logistical reasons, the BRP demo
>uses canned data rather than the ballots from the other demos
>operating at the same time.
>
>Furthermore, you often cannot easily expand a system if the
>expansions were not included in the original design (but deferred for
>a later implementation phase).
>
>Best regards,
>Arthur
>
>At 10:13 AM -0500 4/29/04, Mark Winegar wrote:
>>It makes sense that you first build a solid system to accommodate
>>current elections. One with sould auditing, data validation, and
>>verification. Then you can work on refinements to handle the kind of
>>exceptions predicted in California.
>>
>>I'm curious. An early message left me with the impression that the
>>pilot test did not include tallying of votes. Is this correct?
>>
>>Mark Winegar
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dr-jekyll@att.net [mailto:dr-jekyll@att.net]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 8:16 AM
>>To: voting-project@lists.sonic.net
>>Subject: Re: [voting-project] What is Data Model FOR?
>>
>>
>>>Aggregation is likely to involve move than a simple counter. Maybe
>>>the
>>
>>>counter suffices for a first pass, on some kinds of races. But
>>>consider, for example either N of M or ranked-preference contests.
>>>The
>>
>>>tallying of rank orders involves more than just counting the votes;
>>>for
>>
>>>example, in IRV, it would go through stages with reassignments of
>>>votes
>>
>>>and recounts.
>>
>>>It -might- be important to the aggregation to create totals by
>>>districts of various sorts. Elections might not be by simple vote
>>>count, but rather by weights assigned to subsets of the electorate.
>>>The US Electoral College is an example of this at a national level,
>>>but
>>
>>>I understand that some cities handle council elections according to
>>>similar indirect rules.
>>
>>I've personally never heard of such an election in American political
>>elections, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. Can you supply the
>>name of the jurisdiction that held or currently holds such elections.
>>I'll contact them, learn their rules, and make adjustments.
>>
>>BTW -- I've seen a number of the new voting machines and not one that
>>I've seen has this feature. If there is a need for it, I'll take great
>
>>pleasure in designing a data layout that will support processing the
>>votes.
>>
>>Kurt
>
>
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------
>Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4507 tel
>+1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:24 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT