Re: Regarding the software quality of a competitor

From: Ed Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 22:41:41 CDT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Dechert" <alan_at_openvotingconsortium_dot_org>
To: <voting-project@lists.sonic.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Regarding the software quality of a competitor

> > Here's another version of the events from the normally rather
conservative
> > San Diego Union Tribune.
> >
> >
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040414-9999-6m14diebold.html
> >
> This article sounds pretty rosey. "They're going to fix the problems."
>
> Another watchdog of electronic voting, Kim Alexander,
> president of the California Voter Foundation, also praised

Actually that was the nice article. There was another one that followed
that was much less flattering. In this case, I thought I might let the
facts speak for themselves, to try to give the rest of you a reminder of
who's going to be operating this software and about the importance of
simplicity in the training.

Thanks, Ed Kennedy
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:15 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT