Re: Regarding the software quality of a competitor

From: Ed Kennedy <ekennedyx_at_yahoo_dot_com>
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 21:03:42 CDT

Here's another version of the events from the normally rather conservative
San Diego Union Tribune.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040414-9999-6m14diebold.html

Thanks, Ed Kennedy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Duke Winsor" <duke_at_winsor_dot_com>
To: <voting-project@lists.sonic.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:42 AM
Subject: [voting-project] Regarding the software quality of a competitor

> This is from the Politech mailing list. It refers to an Oakland Tribune
> article that documents the legal troubles of a company that allegedly
> did not subject its software to "certification."
>
>
> >Subject: [Politech] Diebold knew of legal risks of its voting machines
[priv]
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: DIEBOLD knew of legal risks
> >Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <jhall@sims.berkeley.edu>
> >Reply-To: joehall@pobox.com
> >To: Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>, Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
> >
> >
> >Big development in the Diebold affair.... here in CA.
> >
> >DIEBOLD knew of legal risks
> >Oakland Tribune - Oakland,CA,USA
> >By Ian Hoffman, STAFF WRITER. Attorneys for Diebold Election Systems
> >Inc. warned in late November that its use of uncertified vote ...
> ><http://www.oaklandtribune.com/Stories/0,1413,82~1865~2095811,00.html>
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Joseph Lorenzo Hall, SIMS PhD Student; UC Berkeley.
> >[web:<http://pobox.com/~joehall/>, blog:<http://pobox.com/~joehall/nqb>]
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Politech mailing list
> >Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> >Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:15 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT