Re: FW: Not your ordinary barcode

From: Arthur Keller <arthur_at_kellers_dot_org>
Date: Mon Apr 19 2004 - 16:39:27 CDT

Registration of preprinted ballot forms may be a problem for
printers. And if the lines are off, they will be hard to count.
Better to print the form and the ballot together on the printer.
That doesn't preclude the use of preprinted ballot forms compatible
with the forms printed by computer and counted the same way. After
all, the preprinted ballot forms have registration marks on them also.

This approach does not preclude the use of "blank" ballot forms on
special paper used in the computer printers. And it would make the
process of counting absentee ballots more compatible with counting
computer-printed ballots.

Best regards,
Arthur

At 1:05 PM -0400 4/19/04, Popkin, Laird (WMG Corp) wrote:
>A question from a friend:
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Lazarus [mailto:eric.lazarus@decisionsmith.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 12:53 PM
>To: 'Popkin, Laird (WMG Corp)'
>Subject: RE: [voting-project] Not your ordinary barcode
>
>Why can't the BPD computer basically fill in a pre-printed,
>numbered, polling-place counted, human readable ballot? That's the
>quesiton that my secuirty expert friend RB asks. It should just draw
>the same lines that a human could draw between candidate on one side
>and office on the other. We could use existing systems to read such
>ballots.
>
>E

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA  94303-4507
tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:13 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT